Wikipedia talk:Edit warring
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Edit warring page. |
|
 | The project page associated with this talk page is an official policy on Wikipedia. Policies have wide acceptance among editors and are considered a standard for all users to follow. Please review policy editing recommendations before making any substantive change to this page. Always remember to keep cool when editing, and don't panic. |
 | This is not the page to report edit warring or 3RR violations. Please instead create a report at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. |
 | See WP:PROPOSAL for Wikipedia's procedural policy on the creation of new guidelines and policies. See how to contribute to Wikipedia guidance for recommendations regarding the creation and updating of policy and guideline pages. |
 | The contents of the Wikipedia:Three-revert rule page were merged into Wikipedia:Edit warring. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
|
2012: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2013: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2024: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Archived polls for Three-revert rule
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Additional clarification should be added to the article
[edit]The following is my perspective.
Consider the following situation (this is intended as a hypothetical). User A adds a section to the talk page of an article stating they intend to add a section to the article. User B knows about the talk page section but does not respond (consider in this hypothethical that User B was pinged or somehow otherwise knows). User A adds the section to the article. User B deletes it. User A reverts. User B reverts again. User A reverts a second time. User B then reverts again. User A then makes a new addition to the talk page section, pinging User B again. All in all, User A reverted twice, and then disengaged from the act of reverting, and resorted to dialogue and waiting.
It is my understanding that the administrator community considers the act of User A to be "edit warring" (we accept this term for the sake of argument), in spite of (a) attempting to engage in consensus discussion prior to the "edit war", and (b) disengaging from the "edit war" after it became apparent that it was in fact, or was going to be an edit war should User A continue. Not only that, but the administrator community seems to believe that this justifies a 7-day block, even on a new user.
In my personal opinion, I disagree with that, and I think that the language of the rules on blocking (WP:BLOCK) supports my position. Lets say I'm right. The article here should be edited so that the administrator team knows not to block User A in the above situation. Lets say I'm wrong. We should still be able to see how User A could have read this article, and believed reasonably that what they were doing did not constitute an edit war, and the article should be clarified so that editors do not mistakenly 'violate' this rule and be subjected to a 7-day block over a good faith mistake.
Again, this is just my opinion. Thank you.
Isonomia01 (talk) 08:07, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- In the situation you've outlined, I'd say that neither A nor B is in the right because they're both reverting each other. That one of them started a Talk page section doesn't mean anything if they then engage in reverting. Put another way, the act of starting a Talk page section doesn't give an editor the right to keep reverting someone who isn't engaging on the Talk page. DonIago (talk) 08:12, 29 December 2024 (UTC)